FREEZE!!! everybody clap your hands....

okay i just typed a whole thing out, it was pretty good if i do say so myself then it my internet crashes and i loose it, i had just finished it too!!!  okay i try again haha...
What is a common rock (commonly used for countertops) found all over the world?
...
Dora: THATS RIGHT!!! -haha
The corect answer is granite. Now you may be wondering what is that a picture of because that doesn't look like granite, don't worry its not, this is a picture of a polonium radio halo. They are rings formed when the radioactive substance Polonium-218 is present. Now most radioactive substances last for a long time and decay over long periods of time, but Polonium-218 is one of the few that decay very rapidly. It has a half-life of 3.05 minutes. So, to form a Polonium-218 halo, Polonium-218 needs to be embedded in the rock before it became solid and had to be decaying to form the halo AFTER the rock became solid. In other words its like a bean in an icecube, to gt there, it needs to have been in the water before it froze. Since Polonium-218 has a short life, the rock had to have cooled very quickly. This means that the granite formed quickly. Now this is where the problem is for the big bang, that says there was a hot earth that cooled over billions of years. For more go to ~~> http://www.ichthus.info/Creation-Evidence/Polonium-Halos/intro.html <~~

Mt. Rushmore whohaha

I'm going to describe a little senario for you. Once upon a time, there was a little boy that went on a family road trip to Mt. Rushmore. They took the toor and it ended at the best viewing spot of the mountian. The little boy asked the toor guide, "Mr. Toor Guide, did thier faces get on that rock by chance?" The guide replied, "No! of course not, how could you think that?!" The little boy, in an attempt to redeem himself, said, "But my science teacher said humans were made by chance, so I figured just the face of a man would be too..." I'm going to end the story here. A scientist would tell you the faces on Mt. Rushmore got there because they had a designer, not by a complex system of weathering. But, they will say they observed it being formed. Even carvings on rocks that are centuries old we assume to have been designed. Now they turn around and say that they were created by a complex system that completely happened by chance? I dont think I need to explain even further. According to thier own ideas, it seems we are evolving back into the unintelligent monkey...

The Big Ditch

If you've ever been to the Grand Canyon, it sure is an amazing site to see. If you go to the bottom you can imagine the amount of force it would take to carve this amazing creature. Only it is said it formed over millions of years by the tiny stream of water that is the Colorado river. The top of the grand canyon is higher than where the river enters the canyon by over 4000 feet, this means that if traveled uphill, which doesnt happen naturally. There's also no delta, mud buildup that would be formed that washed out of the canyon. Because of this you could logically conclude that the river didnt create the canyon. It is possible the Grand Canyon is a breech in a giant dam, the Kaibab uplift. The barbed canyons on the east side seem to prove this.
There has been a discovery of pollen grains of gymnosperm and angiosperm at the lowest strata of the canyon. Pollen finds have been found in both "Precambrian" and "Cambrian" strata which are before pollen "formed," pollen should only be found in and above the Carboniferous strata. Steven Austin, sedimentary geologist with the Institute for Creation research has conducted uniformitarian radioactive dating tests and found that solidified lava layers near the top are were dated to be older than lava layers buried deeply under the lowest strata, which is contrary to the principle of superposition. As said in an earlier post, radioactive carbon tests are not sufficient to be trustworthy but because most scientist say that they are, this is something for them to rethink.

1,000 or 10,000,000,000

Radioactive carbon dating methods are used to determine the ages of rocks, fossils, and everything in between. The dates found seem to be sientific fact that the earth is more than 6,000-10,000 years old. This can be scientifically disputed though. Radiocarbon dating methods rely on a few assumptions. For one, it assumes the Uniformitarian Principle is true, that everything has always been as it is right now. How does this apply to dating methods? It assumes that the rates of decay for radiocarbon have always been and always will be the same. But, this cannot be known because it is not observable, and if something is not observable then it is not science. Also another assumption is that the formation of radiocarbon has been and still is at the same rate, again cannot be considered true because not observable. There is also the topic of "blind studies" if you would like to know more about those and more about radiocarbon dating see the link. ~~>Link<~~

Go, bird, go!

How do you evolve flight? Archaeopteryx is a famous fossil that is the supposed link between birds and dinosaurs. It had winged claws, teeth, and feathers. They say that the scales evolved into feathers and that is how reptiles evolved flight. Upon further inspection, you can see that feathers and scales are completely different. feather scales <~ mouse over, hard to see with my black background
They happen to be different.
So how did reptiles evolve flight then? Did a dinosaur just run off a cliff and hope that some wings sprouted, oh wait... evolution is gradual change. Wings are arodynamic so that they can fly fast, be light-weight, and still be strong. It needs to be a wing to fly, not a extra long/wide arm. So how did flight evolve?

TOPIC!!

I have decided what this blog is going to be about!! The topic of evolution, whenever i find something against it, i will post about it. I already have the first one, it has to do with flight...

...

I will be posting sum stuff soon, idk when but i think ill just start a srory or somthin... so ya